.
Feedback

Alexandria Planning Commission OKs Polk Avenue Open Space

The heavily wooded site will serve as a refuge for wildlife, local residents.

The Alexandria Planning Commission unanimously approved the purchase of a parcel of land on Polk Avenue to preserve open space on the city’s West End.

The Beauregard Rezoning Advisory Group recommended the Polk Avenue site out of several options in October. The city plans to acquire the 2.4-acre lot, located at the intersection of Polk and North Pelham Street, for $1.9 million.

The Department of Defense has given the city $1.5 million in compensation to establish an open space in the Beauregard corridor as part of the BRAC negotiations. The additional $400,000 to pay for the property would be taken from the city’s Capital Improvement Program Open Space Fund.

The property is heavily wooded and steeply sloped and includes the foundation of a house that was destroyed by a fire in April.

Nine people spoke at a public hearing before the commission’s vote, all in support of the property’s acquisition. Resident Jack Sullivan praised the commission for deferring a decision on a 2007 proposal to build housing units on the property.

“The vote tonight marks the successful culmination of your past wisdom, for which we owe you a lot of thanks,” Sullivan said. “A prime piece of forest will now be preserved for all the people of Alexandria.”

West End resident Kathy Burns called the land in question the last heavily forested parcel in the city. “It would be a win-win for West End community, for the city of Alexandria, for the property owners and the surrounding neighbors and schoolchildren,” Burns said.

Resident Shirley Downs added, “It is a magical site, and when you go there, you’ll find that out.”

Commission member Eric Wagner made the motion to approve the purchase. “I think it is a special parcel,” he said. “I have been on it a few times. … It really is a very pretty site.”

According to city documents, the foundation of the house will be removed from the property. The city will also construct trail access, park furnishings such as benches and a trash can, as well as maintain the property as needed.

The estimated cost of these improvements is between $78,000 and $170,000 and would require future Capital Improvement Program funding from the city.

Love Patch? Give us a thumbs up on Facebook!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from West End Alexandria Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
John Smith June 13, 2013 at 05:57 pm
And do we carry our groceries out of the store in a "bag" or in a "sack"?
Scooby's Doo June 13, 2013 at 06:00 pm
We put the bags in a buggy.
Jonathan Krall April 15, 2013 at 03:14 pm
Jim, Thanks for speaking up about this. I sent in the following comment: To:Read More lisa.jaatinen@alexandriava.gov Dear Ms. Jaatinen, I am writing about the Eisenhower widening project. I am a resident of Alexandria who often rides along Eisenhower by bicycle and who sometimes uses the Eisenhower Metro Station. I am concerned that Alexandria is trying to have it both ways with cars and transit by trying to add both pavement and transit lines. This is is a wasteful strategy in terms of money and public safety. From where I sit, it seems that this have-it-both-ways approach is the reason that city staff is resistant to bike lanes or even bike parking. My points: - If we are going to widen Eisenhower Ave, we need bike lanes and sidewalks that will deliver people to high-capacity transit. - Even if VDOT provides part of the money for this project, we do not need to spend tax dollars adding traffic lanes that will fill with cars right away and are expensive to maintain. - Expanding Eisenhower Ave from four to six lanes right next to the Eisenhower Ave Metro Station makes walking to the station less safe and less attractive. - We need better quality of life and more fiscal responsibility, not more of our valuable land allocated gridlocked cars. Thank you for your time and attention. Jonathan Krall [address/phone]
D April 4, 2013 at 05:21 pm
This is an interesting opinion piece, but it needs way more context. Could the Patch (or the author)Read More provide some articles and/or links?