.
Feedback

Beauregard Group Talks Architectural Standards

Advisory group met Saturday to review standards and implementation phasing.

Members of the Beauregard Rezoning Advisory Group hashed out details about architectural standards and implementation phasing Saturday morning at James K. Polk Elementary School.

The group reviewed architectural standards and guidelines for buildings in the proposed redevelopment presented by Marina Khoury, a partner with DPZ, the project's planning firm. Group member and lawyer Cathy Puskar warned against creating an overly-detailed form-based code that could allow developers to build without further community input.

A form-based code sets general standards for buildings, such as width and height. Puskar also said despite comments from some in the community the project was being rushed, several of her clients have been waiting to build in the area for years.

“It's just wrong,” she said. “And what's going to happen is these guys are going to say, enough is enough.”

Khoury said form-based codes can be as restricted or as loose as planners decide but some standards should be prescribed, such as block sizes.

Group member Carolyn Griglione questioned whether standards set now could be changed in the future.

“It's a little bit scary when we don't get it right,” she said.

Jeff Farner, deputy director of planning for the city of Alexandria, said the city should mandate style and quality standards, such as street and sidewalk width, and leave other options more flexible. Other elements of buildings can be prescribed through a development special use permit.

The group discussed how the standards and guidelines can be used as a living document.

“Things do change, and things will change,” Puskar said.

Group member Kevin Posey cautioned the group should maintain flexibility in the project, saying not all group members will see eye-to-eye on all elements. Puskar said while some members may like elements others find horrific, setting standards will at least ensure the buildings are high-quality.

The group then launched into a discussion on details of the plan's implementation phasing, which determines at which point in the planning process different elements will be addressed, concurring with city planners on provisions including alleyways, a grocery store, land use strategy, a fire station, parking, building orientation and walkability.

Group members recommended changes to the implementation phasing on elements including street cart vendors, provision of government services such as a post office, a community facilities proposal and prohibition of surface parking lots.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from West End Alexandria Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
John Smith June 13, 2013 at 05:57 pm
And do we carry our groceries out of the store in a "bag" or in a "sack"?
Scooby's Doo June 13, 2013 at 06:00 pm
We put the bags in a buggy.
Jonathan Krall April 15, 2013 at 03:14 pm
Jim, Thanks for speaking up about this. I sent in the following comment: To:Read More lisa.jaatinen@alexandriava.gov Dear Ms. Jaatinen, I am writing about the Eisenhower widening project. I am a resident of Alexandria who often rides along Eisenhower by bicycle and who sometimes uses the Eisenhower Metro Station. I am concerned that Alexandria is trying to have it both ways with cars and transit by trying to add both pavement and transit lines. This is is a wasteful strategy in terms of money and public safety. From where I sit, it seems that this have-it-both-ways approach is the reason that city staff is resistant to bike lanes or even bike parking. My points: - If we are going to widen Eisenhower Ave, we need bike lanes and sidewalks that will deliver people to high-capacity transit. - Even if VDOT provides part of the money for this project, we do not need to spend tax dollars adding traffic lanes that will fill with cars right away and are expensive to maintain. - Expanding Eisenhower Ave from four to six lanes right next to the Eisenhower Ave Metro Station makes walking to the station less safe and less attractive. - We need better quality of life and more fiscal responsibility, not more of our valuable land allocated gridlocked cars. Thank you for your time and attention. Jonathan Krall [address/phone]
D April 4, 2013 at 05:21 pm
This is an interesting opinion piece, but it needs way more context. Could the Patch (or the author)Read More provide some articles and/or links?