.
Feedback

Alexandria Officials: High-Dollar Transit Projects Beneficial to City

Agenda:Alexandria held a forum on the city’s transit plans Monday night.

Alexandria city officials laid out the city’s plans for improved transit options Monday night at a forum organized by Agenda:Alexandria, a local nonprofit.

Panelist Eric Wagner, member and former chairman of the Alexandria Planning Commission, called city staff highly competent but added he is at times skeptical of plans presented to the commission. The question before the city is, he said, should it not pursue transit initiatives due to cost?

“That view would suggest that we somehow should push back against all of the forces that we don’t control and preserve a status quo or an improved status quo of that status quo, an improved version of today,” Wagner said. “But I don’t think that’s actually possible, or necessary desirable, for the city.”

Rich Baier, director of the city’s Transportation and Environmental Services Department, told local residents that officials are attempting to decrease the city’s dependence on trips made in single-occupancy vehicles through programs including:

  • Bus rapid transit lanes in the following corridors: Route 1, Van Dorn/Eisenhower Avenue and Beauregard/Van Dorn streets;
  • Potomac Yard Metrorail development;
  • Improvements to and expansion of DASH;
  • King Street Metro lot improvements;
  • A VRE tunnel to connect Union Station to the King Street Metro station;
  • Capital BikeShare expansion;
  • Safety measures such as traffic calming, shared-use paths and pedestrian safety;
  • Improvements to the intersection of Beauregard and King streets; and
  • Eisenhower Avenue improvements.

Additionally, Baier said, the Virginia Department of Transportation is planning to add an auxiliary lane to northbound I-395 between Duke Street and Seminary Road. VDOT also has plans to add a northbound HOV ramp to Seminary Road and complete additional improvements surrounding the BRAC 133 complex, he noted.

Mark Jinks, deputy city manager, said many of the projects underway are being funded at least in part by the state and federal governments. However, state and federal funds for transit and transportation projects have largely dried up to stagnant gas tax rates, coupled with higher fuel efficiency, and the loss of federal earmarks, he said.

“Those monies basically today are completely zeroed out,” he said. “We’re not getting anything at all.”

Jinks focused his comments on the proposed Potomac Yard redevelopment and new Metro station, forecast to cost $1.1 billion over the next 10 years, about half of which is transportation funding, he said. Financial modeling conducted by the city predicts that the project will be more than profitable over the next 30 years, due in large part to new tax revenues generated by new development there and appreciation of those properties.

Wagner said he remained worried about city assumptions concerning growth at Potomac Yard. It’s important to install checkpoints along the trajectory of the project at which the project could be reassessed if the city’s growth assumptions fail to hold up, he said.

In the end, Wagner said, many city residents say they want more of an urban environment.

“The kinds of transportation initiatives that we’ve heard discussed here tonight are exactly the sorts of things that will give us the options that we need to become a more urban city,” he said. “You don’t become an urban city just by pretending that you are. You have to have transit options, and transit options just don’t happen by themselves.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from West End Alexandria Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Jim Roberts October 23, 2012 at 11:30 am
Sensible enhancements; insensible cost-share imposed on the taxpayers for the Potomac Yard metro.
Just think: If the Potomac Yard was kept all, or mostly park for carbon sequestering trees in already urban Alexandria, then there would be no carbon-producing cars; no additional dense-packed new residents demanding evermore city services, and no additional taxes on current residents to pay for this massive development. Along with the most expensive high school ever built, a Taj Mahal police station, the Too-Long Reign of Mayor Euille is now bringing us the too-costly Potomac Yard metro. This guy is outta control. Enough.
Autoexec.bat October 23, 2012 at 12:51 pm
Dont' forget the Del Ray/Chirilagua/Executive Ave./Arlandria/Rosemont/Braddock Road Metro Trolley that no one will use.
matt tallmerq October 23, 2012 at 01:41 pm
"Jinks focused his comments on the proposed Potomac Yard redevelopment and new Metro station, forecast to cost $1.1 billion over the next 10 years, about half of which is transportation funding, he said. Financial modeling conducted by the city predicts that the project will be more than profitable over the next 30 years, due in large part to new tax revenues generated by new development there and appreciation of those properties." But what if those models are inaccurate, and the City worst case secnario of achieving profitablity in 50 years are closer to the mark?
While the City may hope for Federal and state dollars coming, given the Silver Line expansion and the dwindling funds available from both the Feds and VA, those funds are doubtful at best. Where does that leave City taxpayers? On the hook for roughly $500 million in transportation projects. That effectively means the City will not be in a position to pay for another project for up to 50 years using bonds. What happens if a sewer explodes? Or the City faces yet another Federal mandate on wastewater treatment? Or we need another school or firehouse? We're out of luck. Unless the Council wants to gut services to pay for them.
Sheila Pollak October 23, 2012 at 01:50 pm
Why is a tunnel between the Train station and the Metro station necessary? Jeez, it's an easy walk of a block. The expense. Moreover, why spend MILLIONS to reconfigure the King St. Metro parking lot? Makes no sense to me.
Robert Kraus October 23, 2012 at 02:45 pm
Like development - especially the BRAC fiasco - we need to learn from past mistakes! The city keeps finding new ways to spend our (the taxpayers) money!
Example: The new free DelRay Trolley. It is a bad idea - we had a free Dash bus before but it was a failure. Less than 20 people a day used this service. It would have been cheaper to pay round trip taxi fare and cover folks lobster and steak dinners. And please do not get me started on Metro! Just last night it took me 45 minutes to go from Foggy Bottom to King Street Metro on the Blue Line – during rush hour. It used to only take 15-20 minutes. I had to wait for 4 Orange Line trains before my Blue Line train showed up. Why? Because Metro cut 50% of the Blue Line trains during rush hour! 12-16 minute wait for a train that services 75% of the Metro stops in the city. Now I ask - was our Metro supplement adjusted accordingly? The answer - no. We keep paying more for less service and are treated like an evil step child by metro compared to Arlington. Let Arlington, with 30 times the density in Potomac Yards area, pay for a Metro station. I keep asking why Alexandria needs to pony up $200M plus? Elect Robert Kraus for City Council and I will curtail spending and return $1,400 a year to home owners who, like me, are sick of paying more for less! Respectfully submitted, Robert Kraus www.Robert4CityCouncil.com
Lee Hernly October 23, 2012 at 04:23 pm
The City is making the same mistakes that Portland, Oregon made when they underwent urbanization.
Louise Halliday October 23, 2012 at 05:02 pm
You young ones won't remember this, but a couple of decades ago when RF&P sold Potomac Yard, the new developers created a plan for the Yard called Alexandria 2020 that would have made it a state of the art transit center with TWO Metro stations (one in Alexandria, the other at the Arlington end of the Yard) paid for by the developer. The same Eric Wagner led the Del Ray charge to defeat that plan, and when the density was reduced the Metro stations vaporized. Just sayin, ya know ....
Interesting how he outed Poul Hertel and George Foote as the men behind the whole transportation corridor stuff.
Ed Didion October 23, 2012 at 05:42 pm
Per the City of Alexandria website under subsidies, this City Council spends fifteen (15) million dollar a year in taxpayer funds subsidizing DASH & WMTA bus service.
These two companies operate at about a 5% occupancy rate at best and I feel that something needs to be done to stop this waste of taxpayer dollars. If hardly anyone is using this service why continue operating it at all. I personally would like some answers please! Sincerely, Ed Didion dzona06@aol.com
Andrew Macdonald October 24, 2012 at 03:31 pm
With the possible exception of Mark Jink's presentation (which outlined - finally -- many of the risks associated with the funding of the proposed metro stop at Potomac Yards) the presentations by Mr. Baier and Mr Wagner were monologues: in support of the status quo, in support of business and transportation planning as usual, in support of the kind of transparency and community involvement that have preceded a great deal of this kind of transportation planning and other mixed-use planning too.
The talks illustrated why we need to change the way we are attacking problems and replace possibly the staff in charge of such planning too. Agenda Alexandria needs to change their format -- cut back on lengthy speeches from participants --and promote more of a real debate among folks with different view points too. Andrew Macdonald Andrew Macdonald for Mayor
Katy Cannady October 24, 2012 at 04:24 pm
Because I am a chronic meeting goer, I attended the meetings of the transportation master plan committee that Poul Hertel, George Foote, and Eric Wagner all served on. That was some years ago now. The plan Mr. Hertel and Mr. Foote promoted was to give the advantages to the transit rider, not the automobile user. If corridors were created according to the Hertel-Foote plan, we would not be widening a section of Beauregard. Mr. Hertel later served on the corridor working group as the appointee of the Alexandria Federation of Civic Associations where he was one of just two votes against widening Beauregard. At the public hearings, he testified against the widening of Beauregard to create a bus rapid transit lane, but remove no cars whatsoever. He joined with citizens in opposing any transit corridor that would parrallel the Metro line at the edge of Old Town. There will be none.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
John Smith June 13, 2013 at 05:57 pm
And do we carry our groceries out of the store in a "bag" or in a "sack"?
Scooby's Doo June 13, 2013 at 06:00 pm
We put the bags in a buggy.
Jonathan Krall April 15, 2013 at 03:14 pm
Jim, Thanks for speaking up about this. I sent in the following comment: To:Read More lisa.jaatinen@alexandriava.gov Dear Ms. Jaatinen, I am writing about the Eisenhower widening project. I am a resident of Alexandria who often rides along Eisenhower by bicycle and who sometimes uses the Eisenhower Metro Station. I am concerned that Alexandria is trying to have it both ways with cars and transit by trying to add both pavement and transit lines. This is is a wasteful strategy in terms of money and public safety. From where I sit, it seems that this have-it-both-ways approach is the reason that city staff is resistant to bike lanes or even bike parking. My points: - If we are going to widen Eisenhower Ave, we need bike lanes and sidewalks that will deliver people to high-capacity transit. - Even if VDOT provides part of the money for this project, we do not need to spend tax dollars adding traffic lanes that will fill with cars right away and are expensive to maintain. - Expanding Eisenhower Ave from four to six lanes right next to the Eisenhower Ave Metro Station makes walking to the station less safe and less attractive. - We need better quality of life and more fiscal responsibility, not more of our valuable land allocated gridlocked cars. Thank you for your time and attention. Jonathan Krall [address/phone]
D April 4, 2013 at 05:21 pm
This is an interesting opinion piece, but it needs way more context. Could the Patch (or the author)Read More provide some articles and/or links?