.
Feedback

Letter to the Editor: Jason Howell on the Dodd-Frank Act

Former congressional candidate Jason Howell says the Dodd-Frank Act is "too big to Ignore."

To the editor:

While there has been much discussion about the upcoming “Fiscal Cliff” and the Affordable Care Act aka “Obamacare,” there has been a lack of coverage on a bill that affects nearly every citizen of the world: the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. How does this 2,000-plus page law affect you?

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the financial industry employs about 6 million people but as an industry it touches all of us. The Dodd-Frank Act was intended to be transformative in such a way that hasn’t been seen since the Great Depression. To understand the intent of the transformation, it helps to revisit a little history. 

The Banking Act of 1933 (Glass-Steagall Act) was meant to separate commercial banking from investment banking and prevent another Great Depression. The Financial Modernization Act of 1999 (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) repealed the Banking Act of 1933. The new law “modernized” the financial industry by once again allowing commercial and investment banking entities to operate under one umbrella.

Of course, 1999 was a different, nearly nostalgic time: the Euro officially entered the world markets on Jan. 1, and Lance Armstrong won his first Tour de France on July 25. Now the Euro is struggling, and Lance Armstrong has had not one but all seven of his titles stripped. The Financial Modernization Act was signed into law on Nov. 12, 1999; this was merely a few months before the stock market bubble peaked and subsequently burst, in the year 2000.

It wasn’t until the end of 2007 that we began to see the negative effects of the unbridled financial industry. The 2008 Great Recession was preceded by a housing industry bubble and a peak number of financial instruments, products and speculation. 

In 2010, the intent of the Dodd-Frank Act was to undo the damage done to our economy by a poorly regulated financial industry. 

The Dodd-Frank Act is supposed to stop big banks from doing bad things — like failing. Unfortunately, what it’s been better at is stopping small banks from doing good things — like lending. On Sept. 13 of this year, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) completed a report on the impact of Dodd-Frank implementation on community banks and credit unions.

The report is 88 pages long and focuses on the 398 proposed rules required under Dodd-Frank; nearly two-thirds of which have not yet been implemented. Smaller community banks and credit unions are unequally impacted by this regulation. As opposed to the larger banks, small banks don’t have large compliance offices to deal with all of the new rules.

Small banks face two choices: consolidate or close. The GAO’s report highlights “20 percent of lending by community banks can be categorized as small business lending, compared to 5 percent by larger banks.” If community banks merge into bigger banks or just disappear, small business lending will continue to decrease. 

Consider that over the course of history it was our relationship with neighborhood banks that help build American exceptionalism. Private merchant banks helped build the family farm and gave birth to the industrial revolution of the 19th century. Local bank relationships financed the business startups of the 20th century. 

We celebrate the “relationship bank” every year with the holiday classic, “It’s a Wonderful Life.” Do we root for Mr. Potter or George Bailey and the neighbors of Bedford Falls? Few of us live in small towns, but many of us still have relationships with small banks. They finance our education, new businesses, cars and homes. 

What’s bad for small banks is bad for small business. What’s bad for small business is bad for our economy and our daily lives. We need to refine Dodd-Frank into a better bill. It needs to become clearer and less demanding upon the community banks and credit unions that had little or nothing to do with the financial crisis of 2008. 

Congress will be busy this lame duck session, but afterwards they will have other important legislation to address; legislation that affects every citizen of the United States and every citizen of the world. 

The financial sector, like the Dodd-Frank Act is too big to ignore.

Jason Howell, Arlington

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from West End Alexandria Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
John Smith June 13, 2013 at 05:57 pm
And do we carry our groceries out of the store in a "bag" or in a "sack"?
Scooby's Doo June 13, 2013 at 06:00 pm
We put the bags in a buggy.
Jonathan Krall April 15, 2013 at 03:14 pm
Jim, Thanks for speaking up about this. I sent in the following comment: To:Read More lisa.jaatinen@alexandriava.gov Dear Ms. Jaatinen, I am writing about the Eisenhower widening project. I am a resident of Alexandria who often rides along Eisenhower by bicycle and who sometimes uses the Eisenhower Metro Station. I am concerned that Alexandria is trying to have it both ways with cars and transit by trying to add both pavement and transit lines. This is is a wasteful strategy in terms of money and public safety. From where I sit, it seems that this have-it-both-ways approach is the reason that city staff is resistant to bike lanes or even bike parking. My points: - If we are going to widen Eisenhower Ave, we need bike lanes and sidewalks that will deliver people to high-capacity transit. - Even if VDOT provides part of the money for this project, we do not need to spend tax dollars adding traffic lanes that will fill with cars right away and are expensive to maintain. - Expanding Eisenhower Ave from four to six lanes right next to the Eisenhower Ave Metro Station makes walking to the station less safe and less attractive. - We need better quality of life and more fiscal responsibility, not more of our valuable land allocated gridlocked cars. Thank you for your time and attention. Jonathan Krall [address/phone]
D April 4, 2013 at 05:21 pm
This is an interesting opinion piece, but it needs way more context. Could the Patch (or the author)Read More provide some articles and/or links?